Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
A cross-cultural study on color perception : comparing Turkish and Non-Turkish Speakers' perception of blue
Download
index.pdf
Date
2007
Author
Kadıhasanoğlu, Didem
Metadata
Show full item record
Item Usage Stats
274
views
103
downloads
Cite This
Turkish speakers differentiate the blue region of color spectrum into mavi (blue) and lacivert (dark blue); whereas non-Turkish speakers in this study had only one color term in the blue region. The present study aimed to explore the predictions of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Operationally, Categorical Perception (CP) effects were used. In Experiment 1, Turkish speakers performed a naming task to determine an average category boundary between mavi and lacivert. In Experiment 2, both Turkish and non-Turkish speakers’ color-difference detection thresholds were estimated on the average boundary as well as within the mavi and lacivert categories. The thresholds were also estimated in the green region, in which both groups had only one color term. 2-TAFC method, which eliminates the effects of memory or labeling and isolates the perceptual processes, was used to estimate the thresholds. Turkish speakers, and not non-Turkish speakers, were predicted to show CP effects only in the blue region: thresholds should be lower on the boundary than within-category. The result revealed that Turkish speakers’ color-difference detection thresholds were lower than those of non-Turkish speakers both in the blue and the green regions. The difference in the green region does not rule out the LRH. It is possible that this difference resulted from the limitations of the study. Finally, in Experiment 3, Turkish speakers’ thresholds were also estimated on their individual boundaries. The patterns of the thresholds revealed by Experiment 3 were similar to the pattern of the thresholds in Experiment 2.
URI
http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12608556/index.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/16917
Collections
Graduate School of Informatics, Thesis
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
Effects of hue, saturation, and brightness on preference: A study on Goethe's color circle with RGB color space
Camgoz, N; Yener, C (2001-06-29)
In order to investigate preference responses for foreground-background color relationships, 85 university undergraduates in Ankara, Turkey, viewed 6 background colors (red, yellow, green, cyan, blue, and magenta) on which color squares of differing hues, saturations, and brightnesses were presented. All the background colors had maximum brightness (100%) and maximum saturation (100%). Subjects were asked to show the color square they preferred on the presented background color viewed through a computer moni...
The Interaction of Contextual and Syntactic Information in the Processing of Turkish Anaphors
Gracanın Yüksek, Martına; Safak, Duygu Fatma; Demir, Orhan; Kırkıcı, Bilal (2017-12-01)
In contrast with languages where anaphors can be classified into pronouns and reflexives, Turkish has a tripartite system that consists of the anaphors o, kendi, and kendisi. The syntactic literature on these anaphors has proposed that whereas o behaves like a pronoun and kendi behaves like a reflexive, kendisi has a more flexible behavior and it can function as both a pronoun and a reflexive. Using acceptability judgments and a self-paced reading task, we examined how Turkish anaphors are processed in isol...
A hearer-based analysis of Turkish-Azerbaijani receptive multilingual communication
Sağın Şimşek, Sultan Çiğdem (2019-08-01)
Aims and Objectives/Purpose/Research Questions: Receptive multilingualism (RM), a mode of multilingual communication in which speakers of different languages use their own native language to communicate and still understand each other, is considered to be a relatively under-investigated area in multilingual research. This paper examines features of Turkish-Azerbaijani RM and, focusing on a hearer-based analysis, looks into strategies applied for achieving understanding in the receptive multilingual communic...
A Case Study on Identification of Traditional Timber Framed House: Konuralp
Bayazitoğlu, Ümit Ceren; Cengiz, Seda (THE ATHENS INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH; 2016-07-05)
In Anatolian rural settlements, it can be observed that, local architectural components form the urban and the architectural identity of the district. One of these factors is the construction style of the buildings. In the paper, the structural systems of registered and nonregistered timber civil architecture examples, basically from the first half of the 20th century, that constructed in an area having potential in different perspectives will be analyzed. The field of study is Konuralp; a town of the city ...
A Study on evidentiality in Cypriot Turkish and Turkey Turkish with a cross-linguistic perspective
Işık Taş, Elvan Eda; Sağın Şimşek, Sultan Çiğdem (null; 2018-09-20)
A number of studies have thus far compared grammatical features of Turkey Turkish and Cypriot Turkish and have identified the realization of evidentiality as one of the distinguishing features of these two varieties. According to these studies, in Turkey Turkish while the morpheme -DI is used to report witnessed events (direct experience), the morpheme –mIş is used to express hearsay, reported or inferred information (indirect experience) (e.g., Aksu-Koç, 1995). In Cypriot Turkish, on the other hand, hearsa...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
D. Kadıhasanoğlu, “A cross-cultural study on color perception : comparing Turkish and Non-Turkish Speakers’ perception of blue,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2007.