The Deviation of consciousness into bad faith in Sartre’s Being and nothingness /

Download

index.pdf

Date

2014

Author

Çıracıoğlu, Çiğdem

Metadata

Show full item record

Item Usage Stats

256
views

114
downloads

The aim of this study is to examine the relation between labor and freedom in the philosophy of Arendt which is in contrast to the relation between labor and freedom in the philosophy of Marx. My first motivation for comparing the relation between labor and freedom in the philosophies of Arendt and Marx is to understand whether labor is a form of slavery or freedom. And secondly, I try to understand whether Arendt’s conception of freedom which opposes freedom to labor, thereby excluding the relation between freedom and labor, and reduces freedom to “acting politically in the public sphere” is sufficient to understand freedom. In doing so, I question and critically assess the rigid ontological distinctions that Arendt makes between labor, work, and action as well as between the private and political spheres. As my exposition of Arendt’s book The Human Condition in my thesis will make clear, Arendt’s understanding of freedom puts it in strict opposition to necessity and thus labor. Focusing on Arendt’s criticism of Marx’s understanding of labor, I argue that labor and work cannot be so clearly separated. Further, Arendt sees action as the mode of human experience in which freedom is exercised, and action is dependent on work since it is work creates a world wherein action is possible. If we consider that work and action are related and that labor and work cannot be so strictly separated, we see that Arendt’s strict opposition between labor and freedom does not work.

Subject Keywords

Consciousness., Faith., Emotions., Distress (Psychology).

URI

http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12618309/index.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/24351

Collections

Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

Arendt and Marx on the relation between labor and freedom / Uğur, Mesude; Parkan, Barış; Department of Philosophy (2014) The aim of this study is to examine the relation between labor and freedom in the philosophy of Arendt which is in contrast to the relation between labor and freedom in the philosophy of Marx. My first motivation for comparing the relation between labor and freedom in the philosophies of Arendt and Marx is to understand whether labor is a form of slavery or freedom. And secondly, I try to understand whether Arendt’s conception of freedom which opposes freedom to labor, thereby excluding the relation between...
The political ir/relevance of freedom in the philosophies of Sartre and Arendt Kara, Onur; Deveci, Cem; Department of Political Science and Public Administration (2011) This study examines the concept of freedom in the philosophies of Jean Paul Sartre and Hannah Arendt in the context of their relevance or irrelevance to politics in the context of political freedom, political activity, rights and responsibilities, individuality, plurality and humanism. The major concern is to question the possibilities of political reflection of their conceptions of freedom. In this respect, the study explicates densely enough Sartre's and Arendt's conceptions of freedom respectively and in...
Labor, leisure and freedom in the philosophies of Aristotle, Karl Marx and Herbert Marcuse Kılınç, Doğan Barış; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2006) The aim of this study is to present an examination of the philosophies of Aristotle, Karl Marx and Herbert Marcuse concerning labor and leisure in the context of freedom. These philosophers have paid attention to the concepts labor and leisure; their view of freedom is dependent on the relationship they have established between labor and leisure. To this end, I firstly give a general overview of the concepts labor, leisure and freedom; afterwards, I try to show how these concepts have been considered in the...
Human nature, ethics and politics in the philosophies of Thomas Hobbes and Immanuel Kant Yağanak, Eray; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2013) The aim of this study is to make a comparison between Thomas Hobbes’ and Immanuel Kant’s theories of human nature, ethics and politics. This thesis defends the arguments of Kant’s republican political theory against the claims raised by Hobbes. In this thesis, I shall argue that Hobbes’ empiricist/mechanistic understanding of human nature cannot provide freedom of action for human beings within his ethical and political theory. In contrast to Hobbes, I shall defend the thesis that Kant’s understanding of hu...
The question of freedom in political philosophies of thomas hobbes and jean-jacques rousseau Yiğit, Pervin; Turan, ŞHalil; Department of Philosophy (2007) This thesis aims to examine the question of freedom in its relation to political authority in social contract theories of Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778). In order to do that, discussions on human nature, evolution into political association and the foundations of legitimate governments are focused on. As the social contract theories of Hobbes and Rousseau mainly seek for rational justification of political obligation, the primary aim of this thesis is to analyze the nature o...

Citation Formats

Ç. Çıracıoğlu, “The Deviation of consciousness into bad faith in Sartre’s Being and nothingness /,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2014.