Human nature, ethics and politics in the philosophies of Thomas Hobbes and Immanuel Kant

Download

index.pdf

Date

2013

Author

Yağanak, Eray

Metadata

Show full item record

Item Usage Stats

392
views

546
downloads

The aim of this study is to make a comparison between Thomas Hobbes’ and Immanuel Kant’s theories of human nature, ethics and politics. This thesis defends the arguments of Kant’s republican political theory against the claims raised by Hobbes. In this thesis, I shall argue that Hobbes’ empiricist/mechanistic understanding of human nature cannot provide freedom of action for human beings within his ethical and political theory. In contrast to Hobbes, I shall defend the thesis that Kant’s understanding of human nature provides an a priori basis for freedom and morality. Kant advances the view that human beings are not only empirical beings but also rational beings, which means their nature and actions can be explained without reference to empirical factors. I shall compare Hobbes with Kant and will propose that the rights of citizens are more secured in the Kantian state.

Subject Keywords

Kant, Immanuel,, Ethics., Liberty., Political science.

URI

http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616177/index.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/22829

Collections

Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

The question of freedom in political philosophies of thomas hobbes and jean-jacques rousseau Yiğit, Pervin; Turan, ŞHalil; Department of Philosophy (2007) This thesis aims to examine the question of freedom in its relation to political authority in social contract theories of Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778). In order to do that, discussions on human nature, evolution into political association and the foundations of legitimate governments are focused on. As the social contract theories of Hobbes and Rousseau mainly seek for rational justification of political obligation, the primary aim of this thesis is to analyze the nature o...
Freedom in the social context: the positions of Aristotle and Jean-Jacques Rousseau Aytemir, Nesil; Ceylan, Yasin; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2018) This thesis aims at examining and comparing the concept of freedom in the social context from the viewpoints of Aristotle (384–322 BC) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778). In order to do that, Aristotle’s ideas on slavery, the position of women in city-state, freedom of citizens, and democracy are emphasized for his position; and Rousseau’s ideas on state of nature, social contract theory, and ideal education are stressed on for his position. As both Aristotle and Rousseau mainly seek for an ideal system ...
Thomas Hobbes and Carl Schmitt on the tension between sovereign and law Ünlü, Özlem; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2018) This thesis aims at developing an understanding of the vital role that the political decision plays in the tension between sovereign and law through an examination of the constitutional theories of Thomas Hobbes and Carl Schmitt. In Schmitt’s classic work Dictatorship of 1921, the sovereign decision derives its legitimacy from its norm-preserving power, whereas in Political Theology appeared in 1922, it legitimizes itself on basis of the norm-giving power. In The Concept of the Political, the decision on wh...
Labor, leisure and freedom in the philosophies of Aristotle, Karl Marx and Herbert Marcuse Kılınç, Doğan Barış; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2006) The aim of this study is to present an examination of the philosophies of Aristotle, Karl Marx and Herbert Marcuse concerning labor and leisure in the context of freedom. These philosophers have paid attention to the concepts labor and leisure; their view of freedom is dependent on the relationship they have established between labor and leisure. To this end, I firstly give a general overview of the concepts labor, leisure and freedom; afterwards, I try to show how these concepts have been considered in the...
Nietzsche's criticisms of Kantian morality Binici, Başta Başar; Parkan, Barış; Department of Philosophy (2010) The purpose of this study is to explain and evaluate Nietzsche’s criticisms of Kantian morality. Kantian morality has greatly influenced western moral thought. Nietzsche’s criticisms focus on the scientific and universal character of this philosophy. This work focuses on the ideas of ‘freedom’, ‘autonomy’, ‘individual virtues’ and ‘morality as a science’. In order to understand and analyze Nietzsche’s critiques, his epistemological criticisms are also evaluated.

Citation Formats

E. Yağanak, “Human nature, ethics and politics in the philosophies of Thomas Hobbes and Immanuel Kant,” Ph.D. - Doctoral Program, Middle East Technical University, 2013.