Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
A comparative analysis of global and national university ranking systems
Date
2015-06-01
Author
Çakır, Murat Perit
Acartürk, Cengiz
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
240
views
0
downloads
Cite This
Recent interest towards university rankings has led to the development of several ranking systems at national and global levels. Global ranking systems tend to rely on internationally accessible bibliometric databases and reputation surveys to develop league tables at a global level. Given their access and in-depth knowledge about local institutions, national ranking systems tend to include a more comprehensive set of indicators. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic comparison of national and global university ranking systems in terms of their indicators, coverage and ranking results. Our findings indicate that national rankings tend to include a larger number of indicators that primarily focus on educational and institutional parameters, whereas global ranking systems tend to have fewer indicators mainly focusing on research performance. Rank similarity analysis between national rankings and global rankings filtered for each country suggest that with the exception of a few instances global rankings do not strongly predict the national rankings.
Subject Keywords
National University Rankings
,
Global University Rankings
,
Higher education
,
Rank Similarity
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/31396
Journal
SCIENTOMETRICS
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1586-6
Collections
Graduate School of Informatics, Article
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
Evaluating research performance of Turkish universities
Tekneci, Pelin Deniz; Taymaz, Erol; Department of Science and Technology Policy Studies (2014)
This dissertation employs different methodologies to evaluate research performance of 94 Turkish universities over the period between 2008 and 2010, compares their results, and identifies factors that enhance their performance. It consists of three papers revolving around the research performance of Turkish universities. First, we apply different Data Envelopment Analysis models and identify the best-fitting model. Second, we investigate the impact of selected factors on different research outputs using pan...
Uncovering the relationship between student engagement and organizational culture in a public university in Turkey
Borhan, Ersan.; Emil, Serap; Department of Educational Administration and Planning Education (2020)
Student engagement has become a seminal phenomenon in recent higher education studies since it is associated with both desirable student outcomes and the quality of higher education policies and practices. It is defined as the time and energy devoted by the students to their studies and institutional efforts to create effective educational environment. Although the literature has given in-depth comprehension about the role of organizational characteristics in engagement, there has been few studies touching ...
UNIVERSITY QUALITY AS A PREDICTOR OF PERCEIVED FUTURE EMPLOYABILITY OF SENIOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
Kaylan, Buse; Emil, Serap; Department of Educational Administration and Planning (2022-12-27)
Today, the increase number of universities and leads to transformation in higher education, so it aroused questions regarding graduate employability and university quality. In this study, the goal is to examine the relationship among senior students’ perceptions of quality at university and their future employability. University quality and future employability responses with senior students’ GPA, work experience, gender, and socioeconomic status are analyzed. This study has been conducted via correlational...
Perspective of Academics on the Impact of Academic Practice
Kondakçı, Yaşar; Zayim Kurtay, Merve; Şenay, Hanife Hilal; Kaya Kaşıkcı, Sevgi; Kulakoğlu, Büşra (Oxford University Press, 2021-5-24)
The pressure on the universities to take a visible place in the rankings has caused anachronistic policies and practices in evaluating the performance of universities. The value attributed to the rankings results in policies prioritizing the criteria imposed by rankings while evaluating the performance of academics, which successively causes several issues in assessing the real impact of the academic practices. Considering these criticisms and concerns about the impact assessment, this study aimed at explor...
A need analysis study for faculty development programs in METU and structural equation modeling of faculty needs
Moeini, Hosein; Alpsan, Doğan; Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology (2003)
The purpose of this doctoral thesis research study was first to investigate the needs for a faculty development program in Middle East Technical University (METU). Later, in the second phase, models that explained the linear structural relationships among factors that might be influential on faculty̕s perceived competencies about the skills necessary for the instructional practices, personal, professional and organizational developments were proposed and compared. In this study, a questionnaire considering ...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
M. P. Çakır and C. Acartürk, “A comparative analysis of global and national university ranking systems,”
SCIENTOMETRICS
, pp. 813–848, 2015, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/31396.