Butler and Heidegger: On the Relation between Freedom and Marginalization

Date

2014-09-01

Author

Karademir, Aret

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

189
views

0
downloads

Though the names Judith Butler and Martin Heidegger rarely come together in Butler and Heidegger scholarship, the critical encounter between these philosophers might help us conceptualize the relationship between freedom and marginalization. In this paper, I will read Butler from the perspective of the Heidegger of Being and Time and claim that what Butler's philosophy suggests is the radical dependency of one's freedom on the cultural resuscitation of socially murdered racial, sexual, ethnic, religious, and sectarian/confessional minorities. More specifically, I will claim that the socially sanctioned subject's freedom is dependent on the marginalized Other's freedom, and, conversely, the marginalized Other's freedom is dependent on the socially sanctioned subject's freedom.

Subject Keywords

Philosophy, Gender Studies

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/37583

Journal

HYPATIA-A JOURNAL OF FEMINIST PHILOSOPHY

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12094

Collections

Department of Philosophy, Article

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

Contextualizing performative identity a synthesis of Judith Butler’s performative process ontology and Michel Foucault’s analytics of power Maze, Jacob Alan; Karademir, Aret; Department of Philosophy (2016) Both Michel Foucault and Judith Butler give an account of a socially constructed subject, yet both philosophers face dilemmas within their own philosophies that are solvable through a reconciliation between the two. While Foucault offers the concepts of genealogy, power and dispositifs to explain the how the subject comes to think, act and speak, there is no mental account of subjectivity to unify the subject and power and explain subject-durability. On the other hand, Butler provides a process ontology of ...
Art(s) of becoming: performative encounters in contemporary political art Akkın, İbrahim Okan; Parkan, Barış; Department of Philosophy (2017) This thesis analyses Deleuze & Guattari’s notion of becoming through certain performative encounters in contemporary political art, and re-conceptualizes them as “art(s) of becoming”. Art(s) of becoming are actualizations of a non-representational –minoritarian– mode of becoming and creation as well as the political actions of fleeing quanta. The theoretical aim of the study is, on the one hand, to explain how Platonic Idealism is overturned by Deleuze’s reading of Nietzsche and Leibniz, and on the other ha...
Irony as a philosophical attitude in socrates Korkut, Hacer; İnam, Ahmet; Department of Philosophy (2007) This thesis analyzes the reasons for Socrates' being presented as a paradoxical figure in the early dialogues of Plato. Irony as a fundamental philosophical attitude in Socratic philosophy is discussed with reference to some of the major philosophers of the history of philosophy. The thesis also suggests the possibility of seeing philosophy as an ironic activity and it traces the etymology of the concept of irony in terms of its philosophical importance.
Revisiting immanence and conatus in Spinoza Yaylım, Berk; İnam, Ahmet; Department of Philosophy (2015) This thesis focuses on the concept of immanence in Spinoza’s philosophy and its importance in explicating theory of knowledge and conatus. While accounting for immanence, it will seek not only his metaphysics but also a critical discussion of transcendence and emanation. After the metaphysical system behind his philosophy is explained, his defense of necessitarianism will be emphasized. In this study, under the light of these, a coherent interpretation of Spinoza’s solutions, how these relate to his theory ...
Labor, leisure and freedom in the philosophies of Aristotle, Karl Marx and Herbert Marcuse Kılınç, Doğan Barış; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2006) The aim of this study is to present an examination of the philosophies of Aristotle, Karl Marx and Herbert Marcuse concerning labor and leisure in the context of freedom. These philosophers have paid attention to the concepts labor and leisure; their view of freedom is dependent on the relationship they have established between labor and leisure. To this end, I firstly give a general overview of the concepts labor, leisure and freedom; afterwards, I try to show how these concepts have been considered in the...

Citation Formats

A. Karademir, “Butler and Heidegger: On the Relation between Freedom and Marginalization,” HYPATIA-A JOURNAL OF FEMINIST PHILOSOPHY, pp. 824–839, 2014, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/37583.