Hegemony versus homour: an analysis of Turkish polarized politics through press portrayals 1947-1960

Download
2020
Mumcu, Özge
Humor and laughter represent a leaping barrier in the freedom of speech since humour and laughter consist of the transgression of a rule, while censorship places the limits of what can and cannot be said and consequently what can be transgressed or silenced. Political satire represents a counter-hegemonic project, operating as a war of position; it degrades the official discourse by revealing the weakness of regime. As political satire represents a counter-hegemonic project and a war of opposition, the authoritarian tendency is to approach political satire while referring it as inconvenient to the given political order. In this stage, freedom of expression and freedom of speech issues gain importance since the satire flourishes first, and laws try to prevent them from being effective. As each sign refracts reality in different settings, each sign has a struggle over another sign. The authoritarian type of political power leads the caricature to flourish as a tool for freedom of expression. In different phases of Turkish political life whenever a political power turns into to gain an authoritarian character, caricature and use of political satire as a tool for freedom of expression become prominent in press and media. The period of 1947 and 1960, a transitional phase from single-party rule to multi-party politics was chosen as it represents a fracture in Turkish political history in a constant swing from authoritative tendencies to emancipating tendencies in where the use of political satire gains significance.

Suggestions

What is wrong with hate speech : reflections on political theory, legal regulations and Turkish case
Binbuğa Kınık, Burcu Nur; Deveci, Cem; Department of Political Science and Public Administration (2013)
Hate speech has become common and ordinary in our daily life. We can face expressions based on hate speech in the social media and in the mainstream media; also this kind of expressions can be stated by the politicians. The aim of this study is to discuss theoretical arguments concerning why hate speech is harmful and shouldn’t be evaluated within the boundaries of freedom of expression. Moreover, in this study, it is aimed to present the regulations and conventions concerning limitation of freedom in the c...
Assessing dispositions towards ridicule and being laughed at: Development and initial validation of the Turkish PhoPhiKat-45
DURSUN, PINAR; Dalğar, İlker; Brauer, Kay; Yerlikaya, Ercument; Proyer, Rene T. (2020-02-01)
How people deal with humor and laughter is culturally constructed within a society but each member may differ in their attitudes. Depending upon this, this study aimed to test the factor structure of PhoPhiKat-45 (Ruch and Proyer Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22, 183-212, 2009a) which is a subjective measurement designed to assess three dispositions toward laughter and ridicule; gelotophobia (fear of being laughed at), gelotophilia (joy of being laughed at), and katagelasticism (joy of lau...
Impoliteness and Humour Interaction in Improvised TV Discourse
Karatepe, Çağla; Işık Güler, Hale; Department of English Language Teaching (2015)
Although impoliteness and humour are not two terms that sound related anyhow, this thesis focuses on impoliteness and humour interaction. The conversations from the TV show ‘Arkadaşım Hoşgeldin’are extracted based on the idea that each conversation involves impoliteness and humour in itself. The analysis involves how such conversations are initiated and closed, how humour and/or impoliteness is triggered in conversations, and some remarks about the conventional strategies and formulae used as well as the le...
Nationalist bias in Turkish official discourse on hate speech: a Rawlsian criticism
Deveci, Cem (2019-01-01)
This article analyzes the approach in Turkey on hate speech by evaluating legal regulations, decisions and public responses. We argue that the Turkish case cultivates neither a lenient, nor a restrictive response to hate speech, because a strong nationalist bias seems to be at work in interpreting, penalizing or allowing hate speech. The peculiarity of the Turkish case stems from a prejudice that hate speech might be conducted only against the nation, unity of the state, or the principles of regime, rather ...
Explicit evaluative comments on Turkish impoliteness Building a model of impoliteness2 on impoliteness1
Işık Güler, Hale (2009-07-02)
Many past politeness theories have been devised “at the expense of ignoring the lay person’s conception of politeness as revealed through their uses of the terms polite and impolite” (Culpeper, 2008, p.19). With the intention of using (im)politeness1 (lay) conceptualisations to inform the (scientific) theorizing of (im)politeness2, this study investigates the conceptualisation of ‘impoliteness’ (Tr. Kaba) for Turkish native speakers (hereafter, TNS). The data for the study comes from a number of sources: a ...
Citation Formats
Ö. Mumcu, “Hegemony versus homour: an analysis of Turkish polarized politics through press portrayals 1947-1960,” Thesis (Ph.D.) -- Graduate School of Social Sciences. Political Science and Public Administration., Middle East Technical University, 2020.