Modeling of a historical earthquake in Erzincan, Turkey (Ms similar to 7.8, in 1939) using regional seismological information obtained from a recent event

Date

2018-06-01

Author

Karim Zadeh Naghshineh, Shaghayegh
Askan Gündoğan, Ayşegül

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

73
views

0
downloads

Located within a basin structure, at the conjunction of North East Anatolian, North Anatolian and Ovacik Faults, Erzincan city center (Turkey) is one of the most hazardous regions in the world. Combination of the seismotectonic and geological settings of the region has resulted in series of significant seismic activities including the 1939 (Ms similar to 7.8) as well as the 1992 (Mw = 6.6) earthquakes. The devastative 1939 earthquake occurred in the pre-instrumental era in the region with no available local seismograms. Thus, a limited number of studies exist on that earthquake. However, the 1992 event, despite the sparse local network at that time, has been studied extensively. This study aims to simulate the 1939 Erzincan earthquake using available regional seismic and geological parameters. Despite several uncertainties involved, such an effort to quantitatively model the 1939 earthquake is promising, given the historical reports of extensive damage and fatalities in the area. The results of this study are expressed in terms of anticipated acceleration time histories at certain locations, spatial distribution of selected ground motion parameters and felt intensity maps in the region. Simulated motions are first compared against empirical ground motion prediction equations derived with both local and global datasets. Next, anticipated intensity maps of the 1939 earthquake are obtained using local correlations between peak ground motion parameters and felt intensity values. Comparisons of the estimated intensity distributions with the corresponding observed intensities indicate a reasonable modeling of the 1939 earthquake.

Subject Keywords

Historical earthquakes, The 1939 Erzincan (Turkey) earthquake, Ground motion simulation, Felt intensity, Ground motion prediction equations

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/47422

Journal

ACTA GEOPHYSICA

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-0147-9

Collections

Department of Civil Engineering, Article

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

MODELING OF THE 1939 ERZINCAN, TURKEY (MS~7.8)EARTHQUAKE: OBSERVATIONS ON ANTICIPATED GROUNDMOTIONS AND FELT INTENSITY DISTRIBUTION Karimzadeh, Shaghayegh; Askan Gündoğan, Ayşegül (2018-06-18) Located within a pull-apart basin at the conjunction of three active faults (North Anatolian, North East Anatolian and Ovacik Faults), Erzincan city center is one of the most hazardous regions of the world. Combination of the seismotectonic and geological settings of the region has resulted in series of significant seismic activities including the 27 December 1939 (Ms=8.0) and the 13 March 1992 (Mw=6.6) events. The former earthquake was in the pre-instrumental era in the region with no available local seism...
Modeling of the 1939 Erzincan (Ms~7.8) Earthquake: Observations on Anticipated Ground Motions and Damage Distribution (2017-10-11) Located within a pull-apart basin at the conjunction of three active faults (North Anatolian, North East Anatolian and Ovacik Faults), Erzincan city center is one of the most hazardous regions in the world. Combination of the seismotectonic and geological settings of the region has resulted in series of significant seismic activities including the 27 December 1939 (Ms~7.8) and the 13 March 1992 (Mw=6.6) events. The former earthquake was in the preinstrumental era in the region with no available local seismo...
Numerical Modeling of the 1939 Erzincan Earthquake Karim Zadeh Naghshineh, Shaghayegh; Askan Gündoğan, Ayşegül (null; 2019-06-26) Erzincan İli, Kuzey Anadolu Fay Hattı, Kuzey Doğu Anadolu Fay Hattı ve Ovacık Fayları arasında derin bir basen yapısı içerisinde yer almakta olup, dünyanın sismik aktivite açısından en yoğun bölgelerinden birisidir. Bölgenin sismotektonik ve jeolojik koşulları, 1939 (Ms~7.8) ve 1992 (Mw= 6.6) depremleri dahil olmak üzere bir çok tarihi ve aletsel dönem depremlerine sebep olmuştur. 1939 Erzincan depremi çok yıkıcı bir deprem olmakla birlikte, aletsel dönemden önceye denk geldiği için bu depreme ait kayıt bul...
MODELING OF THE 1939 ERZINCAN, TURKEY (MS~7.8) EARTHQUAKE: OBSERVATIONS ON ANTICIPATED GROUND MOTIONS AND FELT INTENSITY DISTRIBUTION Karim Zadeh Naghshineh, Shaghayegh (2018-06-06) Located within a pull-apart basin at the conjunction of three active faults (North Anatolian, North East Anatolian and Ovacik Faults), Erzincan city center is one of the most hazardous regions of the world. Combination of the seismotectonic and geological settings of the region has resulted in series of significant seismic activities including the 27 December 1939 (Ms=8.0) and the 13 March 1992 (Mw=6.6) events. The former earthquake was in the pre-instrumental era in the region with no available local seism...
Evaluation of alluvial deposits in Gemlik basin in terms of earthquake codes. Avşar, Ulaş; Doyuran, Vedat; Department of Geological Engineering (2006) Gemlik County is located in the Marmara Region (NW Turkey), which has been affected by destructive earthquakes sourced from North Anatolian Fault System throughout its history. The bulk of the settlement rests on alluvial deposits of the Gemlik pull-apart basin. So, it is vital to investigate the foundation soils in this basin and the response of them to earthquakes. Many earthquake codes were established by the authorities in different countries of the world to estimate the possible ground shaking and seis...

Citation Formats

S. Karim Zadeh Naghshineh and A. Askan Gündoğan, “Modeling of a historical earthquake in Erzincan, Turkey (Ms similar to 7.8, in 1939) using regional seismological information obtained from a recent event,” ACTA GEOPHYSICA, pp. 293–304, 2018, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/47422.