Structural Assessment and Strengthening of Atatürk’s Mausoleum, Anıtkabir

Download
2010
Toker, Saadet
Kocatürk, Tuba
Ünay, Ali İhsan
Anıtkabir is the mausoleum of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the commander of Turkish War of Independence and the founder of Republic of Turkey. Rather than a work of architecture, Anıtkabir has been a symbol and a focal center of Atatürk’s principles, republican revolutions and modern Turkey. The making of Anıtkabir marks also an important milestone in the architectural history of Republic of Turkey. It is a simple, elegant and aesthetic example of a counter-concept developed against foreign architectural trends in 1940-1950s. Turkish architects and sculptors introduced this work of art by creating modern figures that cover the components of all the past cultures in Anatolia (Figure 1). As a consequence of the World War II, there had been a significant economic downfall in Turkey, especially between the years 1940-1950. In this era, resources had only been spared for strategically important projects. Difficulties in importing reinforcing steel limited the use of reinforced concrete and steel in Turkey as well as all around the world. New constructions started to be erected either by conventional masonry or composite construction techniques. In this period, there are only three prestigious buildings constructed of reinforced concrete in Turkey. These are the Atatürk Cultural Center, the Turkish Grand National Assembly Building, and Anıtkabir. The Atatürk Cultural Center was designed by Feridun Kip and Rüknettin Güney in 1946 and was built in Taksim, İstanbul. The Turkish Grand National Assembly Building was designed by Clemens Holtzmeister in 1938 as a competition project and was built in Ankara, the Capital. The project for Anıtkabir was also designed for a competition by Emin Onat and Orhan Arda in 1942. As for the financial restraints due to the World War II, constructions of all the three buildings were slowed down; moreover the construction of the Atatürk Cultural Center was stopped after the erection of skeletal frame. The project was renewed by Hayati Tabanlıoğlu in 1956 and the construction was completed in 1969, 23 years after it was planned. The project of Anıtkabir was revised in 1951 by Onat and Arda upon the request of the government to decrease the cost. The construction took 9 years from 1944 to 1953. This could be seen as a success when compared to the construction duration of the other two buildings. The construction of the Turkish Grand National Assembly Building started in 1939 and the building was completed in 1961, after 32 years from the start, as majority of the resources were used for Anıtkabir (Tekeli, 2007). Recently in Anıtkabir, the empty space in the basement underneath the mausoleum and the staircase approaching the mausoleum, was decided to be converted into a Turkish War of Independence Museum. A project conducted by the Middle East Technical University (METU) Department of Architecture aimed to assess the general structural capacity and seismic resistance of the mausoleum itself and the structural capacity of the load bearing system used in the staircase. Within the scope of the project, the structural system of Anıtkabir was re-identified, with detailed analytic models prepared for the mausoleum and the staircase separately. Structural analyses were carried out under all possible load cases. Within the frame of the project, both the mausoleum and the staircase sections were analyzed independently under gravity loads. Then another set of analyses was performed to observe the behavior of the structure under probable earthquake loads. Results were evaluated to determine whether the structure is safe or not with its existing condition. Possible effects of modifications about the use of the structure were assessed, and suggestions made for possible modifications on the structural system to obtain a sound structural performance.

Suggestions

Atatürk ün Söylev ve Demeçlerinde Eğitim
GÖKMENOĞLU KARAKAYA, TUBA; Kondakçı, Yaşar (2015-01-01)
The Turkish Enlightenment process started in the last century of Ottoman Empire and become more distinctive along with the changeover to a Turkish Republic in 1920s. Certainly, education took an important part in this enlightenment process. The basic purpose of education is to create an ideal Turkish community, which could catch up basics of modern life, think critically, consult scientific knowledge and experiments, be open-minded, fully rational and foresighted. This purpose underlines different philosoph...
Mimar M. Vedad Bey Konağı
Özkan, Süha; Tek, A Nihad Vedad (Middle East Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, 1979)
Mimar Vedad Bey'in (1873-1943) Türk mimarlık tarihinde çok ayrıcalıklı bir yeri vardır. Türkiye'nin İlk formel eğitim görmüş mimarı olması ötesinde Yirminci Yüzyıl başlarının en önemli mimarlık ürünlerinin biçimleyicisi olarak Vedat Bey haklı bir üne sahiptir. Vedad Bey genellikle çok iyi bilinen Büyük Postane, Halk Fırkası Mahfeli, Defter-i Hakani ve Mesadet Hanı gibi baş yapıtları, dışında küçük yapı ölçeğinde de önemli katkılarda bulunmuştur. Küçük yapı ölçeğinde kendisi için özenle tasarladığı ve uygula...
Mimar Kemalettin Bey (1870-1927)
Yavuz , Yıldırım (Middle East Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, 1981)
The initial phase of nationalism in Turkish architecture is known to have covered those turbulent years between 1909-1930 that saw the fall of the Ottoman Empire as well as the dawn of the Turkish Republic. Locally known as; "The First Period of National Turkish Architecture", these two decades were to witness the fervent struggles of a set of young Turkish architects who opposed the western influences on traditional Ottoman architecture, monopolized by foreign and minority experts for the past hundred year...
Başkent Ankara ve Jansen
Yavuz, Fehmi (Middle East Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, 1981)
Ankara was established as the capital of Turkey on Oct.13, 1923. The decision to move the capital to central Anatolia was the result of economic, social and cultural factors in addition to factors like security and defense. Since Istanbul served not only as the political but the cultural capital for more than 1500 years to Byzantine and Ottoman Empires, the decision for this move was criticized by political circles for a long periodProf. H.Jansen won the competition for the Master Plan of Ankara in 1927; th...
Stress tensor inversion from focal mechanism solutions and earthquake probability analysis of Western Anatolia, Turkey
Shah, Syed Tanvir; Özacar, Atilla Arda; Bozkurt, Erdin; Department of Geological Engineering (2015)
Western Anatolia is one of the most important tectonic elements of Turkey, and constitutes the eastern margin of Aegean Extensional Province. The area is one of the most seismically active continental margins around the globe experiencing NS extension. Earthquake data in this study is used to analyze the active stress patterns and to estimate the earthquake probabilities for different sub-regions in western Anatolia. Various processing techniques to attain homogeneity are applied to the earthquake catalogu...
Citation Formats
S. Toker, T. Kocatürk, and A. İ. Ünay, “Structural Assessment and Strengthening of Atatürk’s Mausoleum, Anıtkabir,” ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 125–138, 2010, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://jfa.arch.metu.edu.tr/archive/0258-5316/2010/cilt27/sayi_1/125-138.pdf.