Analysis of Argumentation and Questioning Patterns in Argument-Based Inquiry Classrooms

Date

2012-04-01

Author

GÜNEL, MURAT
Kingir, Sevgi
Geban, Ömer

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

140
views

0
downloads

The purpose of this study was to analyze the argument-based inquiry approach implementations with respect to questioning in the classrooms. In addition, the study aimed to explore the relationship between levels of questioning and negotiation of ideas. The study was conducted with three teachers and 146 students. The video transcripts obtained from these teachers' classrooms were analyzed through discourse analysis. The findings indicated that teachers' questioning and implementation level are two crucial factors in starting and sustaining the negotiation of ideas in science classrooms. In addition, a relationship was detected among teachers' questioning patterns, number and type of questions generated by students. Finally, the talk moves used by the teacher facilitated students' talk and negotiation.

Subject Keywords

Argument-based inquiry approach, Discourse analysis, Negotiation, Questioning

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/55890

Journal

EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE

Collections

Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Article

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

Investigating questioning patterns of teachers through their pedagogical progression in argument-based inquiry classrooms Kılıç, Burcu; Çakıroğlu, Jale; Günel, Murat; Department of Elementary Science and Mathematics Education (2016) The purpose of this study is to delineate the characteristics of teacher questioning in different implementation qualities of Argument-Based Inquiry (ABI) teaching. With this purpose, first, the characteristics of teacher question types used in high quality ABI classrooms were described, and teacher questions used in high quality practices were distinguished from those posed in medium quality classrooms. Secondly, the study aimed to characterize the sequence of teacher question types that promote high cogni...
Exploring the Effects of Science Writing Heuristic Approach on 8th Grade Students Metacognition Tucel, Tuğçe; Çakıroğlu, Jale; Öztekin, Ceren (2015-09-04) The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach on middle school students' metacognition. For this purpose, a quasi-experimental research design, the non-equivalent control group post-test only design was used with the aim to compare the experimental and the comparison groups mean difference with respect to dependent variables. 60 eight grade students with a mean age of 14 years in two classes selected from one public school in an urban area. One class was ra...
Underlying mechanisms of memory distrust as a function of repeated checking in nonclinical student sample Demirsöz, Talat; Ayvaşık, H. Belgin; Department of Psychology (2007) The purpose of the present study was to examine the underlying mechanism of memory distrust as a function of repeated checking in a nonclinical student sample. Recent literature proposes that repeated checking increases familiarity with the material checked. Then, familiarity makes the recollections less vivid and detailed. Afterwards, this condition promotes distrust in memory. Before the experimental phase of the study, Padua Inventory- Washington State University Revision (PI-WSUR) and demographic inform...
An investigation on constructivist classroom characteristics in ELT methodology II courses Kesal, Füsun; Aksu, Meral; Department of Educational Sciences (2003) The purpose of this study was to investigate to what extent constructivist classroom characteristics existed in ELT Methodology II courses in ELT departments. Secondly, the aim was to explore the extent to which constructivist learning activities and evaluation strategies were perceived to be useful by the students and the instructors. Thirdly, the study also attempted to find out the extent to which the students and the instructors in ELT departments had constructivist conceptions of learning and teaching....
Exploration of preservice teachers’ reflective judgment and argumentation skills revealed in a socioscientific issues-based inquiry laboratory course Karışan, Dilek; Yılmaz Tüzün, Özgül; Zeidler, Dana L.; Department of Elementary Education (2014) This study aimed to explore preservice teachers’ (PTs) reflective judgment skills and determine the argumentation pattern used during argumentation in socioscientific issues (SSI) based Inquiry Laboratory Course (ILC). The association between reflective judgment skills and argumentation pattern was also investigated in SSI-based ILC. The participants of the study were 20 PTs from the Department of Elementary Education at a large, research oriented public university in Turkey. Qualitative research method was...

Citation Formats

M. GÜNEL, S. Kingir, and Ö. Geban, “Analysis of Argumentation and Questioning Patterns in Argument-Based Inquiry Classrooms,” EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, pp. 316–330, 2012, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/55890.