THINKING DESCARTES IN CONJUNCTION, WITH MERLEAU-PONTY: THE HUMAN BODY, THE FUTURE, AND HISTORICITY

Date

2019-02-01

Author

Grıffıth, James Edmond Carr

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

228
views

0
downloads

This article addresses a debate in Descartes scholarship over the mind-dependence or -independence of time by turning to Merleau-Ponty's Nature and The Visible and the Invisible. In doing so, it shows that both sides of the debate ignore that time for Descartes is a measure of duration in general. The consequences to remembering what time is are that the future is shown to be the invisible of an intertwining of past and future, and that historicity is the invisible of God.

Subject Keywords

Religious studies

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/56857

Journal

FILOZOFIA

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2019.74.2.3

Collections

Department of Philosophy, Article

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

Wisdom in relation to ecopsychological self Şahin, Rukiye; Baloğlu, Mustafa; Erdem, Ahmet; Erdem, Şefika (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020-01-01) Theoretical and empirical studies on wisdom continue to interest researchers in various fields. Studies have long pointed out the empirical operationalization of the construct, which has been speculated on since ancient Greece. In addition to numerous theoretical conceptualizations and operational measures, investigations between wisdom and other variables such as positive human traits, dispositional, situational, and environmental variables have helped us understand the concept better. The wisdom developme...
Thinking without the subject: Nietzsche‘s critique of Cartesian and Kantian subjectivity İlbaşı, Kıvılcım; Çırakman, Elif; Department of Philosophy (2015) In this M.A. thesis, I investigate Nietzsche‘s critique of subjectivity with regard to the subject-thought relationship as has been conceptualised in modern philosophy. Firstly, I attempt to elucidate the constitution of the subject and the modern image of thinking by focusing on the ideas of two major figures of modernity, namely, Descartes and Kant. Then, I problematize the concept of the subject with respect to Nietzsche‘s genealogical critique, and try to show that the subjectivist interpretation of the...
The visual formation of cartesian subject in modern metaphysics : a critique of Cogito philosophy Ganioğlu, Zafer; Akçay, Ali Adnan; Department of Sociology (2006) This thesis scrutinizes modern metaphysics through a specific reading and critique of Cartesian Philosophy. In the study, the concepts of metaphysics, ideology, modernity, subject and modern science are re-examined in their relations among them and in that the peculiarity of modern metaphysics is attempted to be revealed. At the core of the thesis, Descartes’ understanding of subject is inquired to be modern subject, and its role in the transformations happened in Western world with the advent of modern age...
Hume’s law as a psychological thesis: an interpretation of and solution to the “is-ought” problem Erdenk, Emre Arda; Sol, Ayhan; Wringe, William G.; Department of Philosophy (2014) This thesis provides an interpretation of David Hume’s “is-ought” problem. According to this interpretation, “is-ought” problem suggests a psychological claim that there cannot be any moral relations. Based on this, I claim that Hume’s Law can be adequately interpreted as a psychological thesis. By means of this, I evaluate three main arguments of Treatise 3.1.1 and analyze the “is-ought” passage in virtue of a contextual reading. Ultimately, I conclude that Hume’s Law is not a logical claim against deducti...
Arthur Schopenhauer and Andras Angyal Lester, David; Zeyrek, Emek Yuce (SAGE Publications, 2006-12-01) Schopenhauer attributed will to both humans and objects, and commentators have dismissed the notion that objects have will. It is proposed that by focusing on our perception of the environment, rather than the environment itself, the theory of personality proposed by Angyal provides a way of attributing forces to both the individual and to the environment.

Citation Formats

J. E. C. Grıffıth, “THINKING DESCARTES IN CONJUNCTION, WITH MERLEAU-PONTY: THE HUMAN BODY, THE FUTURE, AND HISTORICITY,” FILOZOFIA, pp. 111–125, 2019, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/56857.