Counterfactuals and Context: A Response to Brogaard and Salerno

Date

2018-01-01

Author

Demir, Mehmet Hilmi

Metadata

Show full item record

Item Usage Stats

166
views

0
downloads

According to the standard interpretation, counterfactuals fail to satisfy the following inference rules: contraposition, strengthening the antecedent and hypothetical syllogism. Contrary to the standard interpretation, Brogaard and Salerno (2008) argue that counterfactuals do satisfy these inference rules when context features are kept fixed in evaluating arguments with counterfactuals. For them, the main reason behind claiming that counterfactuals fail to satisfy these inference rules is the illicit shift in context when evaluating the arguments in question. If true, Brogaard and Salerno’s claim would have a devastating effect on the counterfactuals literature because almost the entire literature is based on the assumption that counterfactuals do not satisfy those inference rules. Given its importance, Brogaard and Salerno’s claim is examined in this paper. They are right in claiming that contextual features must be kept fixed throughout the evaluation of an argument, but the rest of their claim rests on a faulty reasoning. In the paper, I show that counterfactuals do fail to satisfy contraposition, strengthening the antecedent and hypothetical syllogism even when contextual features are kept fixed throughout the evaluation of an argument in the way Brogaard and Salerno require.

Subject Keywords

Lewis, Contraposition, Counterfactuals, Hypothetical syllogism, Strengthening the antecedent, Karşıolgusal önermeler, Lewis, Varsayımsal kıyas, Tersevirme, Önbileşen güçlendirme

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/75714
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kilikya/issue/32129/414264

Journal

Cilicia Journal of Philosophy

Collections

Department of Philosophy, Article

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

Modal-Epistemik Karşıtlık Karesi ve Uygulamaları Akçelik, Oğuz (Mantık Derneği Yayınları, 2018-01-01) Bu çalışmada, karşıtlık karesi bağlamında modal-epistemik ilkeler ve savlar arasındaki mantıksal ilişkiler incelenecektir. Karşıtlık Karesi, tanımlı dört Aristoteles niceleme biçimleri arasındaki belirli mantıksal ilişkileri ifade eden bir yapıdır. İlk olarak, geleneksel karşıtlık karesinin yapısını kısaca tanıtacağız. Karşıtlık Karesi Aristoteles’in kategoriler mantığında karşıtlık, altkarşıtlık, altıklık ve çelişki yasalarını ifade eder. Bu ilişkileri tanımladıktan sonra karşıtlık karesini kuracağız. Bu ç...
Multi-Relational Concept Discovery with Aggregation Kavurucu, Yusuf; Karagöz, Pınar; Toroslu, İsmail Hakkı (2009-09-16) Concept discovery aims at finding the rules that best describe the given target predicate (i.e., the concept). Aggregation information such as average, count, max, etc. are descriptive for the domains that an aggregated value takes part in the definition of the concept. Therefore, a concept discovery system needs aggregation capability in order to construct high quality rules (with high accuracy and coverage) for such domains. In this work, we describe a method for concept discovery with aggregation on an I...
Pre-service middle school mathematics teachers' interpretation of logical equivalence in proof by contrapositive DEMİRAY, ESRA; Işıksal Bostan, Mine (2017-01-01) The purposes of this study are to investigate pre-service middle school mathematics teachers' interpretations of logical equivalence in proof by contrapositive and the reasons for their incorrect interpretations. Data analysis indicated that pre-service middle school mathematics teachers were considerably unsuccessful in interpreting logical equivalence of statements. Lack of knowledge related to indirect proof methods, accepting a true statement as false, suggesting to apply direct proof instead of selecti...
On the ontology of linguistic frameworks toward a comprehensive version of empiricism Davoody Benı, Majıd (2015-01-01) Can the abstract entities be designated ? While the empiricists usually took the positive answer to this question as the first step toward Platonism, in his "Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology" [Carnap 1950], Carnap tried to make a reconciliation between the language referring to abstract entities on the one hand, and empiricism on the other. In this paper, firstly, I show that the ingenuity of Carnap's approach notwithstanding, it is prone to criticism from different aspects. But I also show how, even wit...
Automated coherence detection with term-distance path extraction of the co-occurrence matrix of a document Ağın, Halil; Acartürk, Cengiz; Department of Cognitive Sciences (2015) This thesis takes the distributional semantics (frequency-based semantics) approach as the theoretical framework to quantify textual coherence. Distributional semantics describes discourse sections as vectors, having dimensions are the frequency count of co-occurring words in the text within its semantic space. It quantifies the textual coherence by measuring the cosine values of vectors of successive sentences (cf. Latent Semantic Analysis, LSA). The common assumption underlying LSA based studies is that t...

Citation Formats

M. H. Demir, “Counterfactuals and Context: A Response to Brogaard and Salerno,” Cilicia Journal of Philosophy, pp. 1–10, 2018, Accessed: 00, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/75714.