Edmund Burke’de Yüce ve Jouissance, Lacancı bir okuma

Date

2018-05-18

Author

Birlik, Nurten

Metadata

Show full item record

Item Usage Stats

385
views

0
downloads

Burke’çü anlamda yüce, şiir kişisinin, doğada gördüğü tekil nesnelere odaklanıp bu nesnelerin arkasında yatan bütüncül metafizik yapının izlerini görebilme ya da doğada görülen nesneler aracılığıyla aşkınlığı deneyimleme çabası olarak tanımlanabilir. Bu deneyim aynı zamanda modernitede, ampirizm ve pozitivizm ile birlikte ortaya çıkan insan ve doğa kategorilerini epistemolojik bağlamda sorunsallaştırır çünkü ikisi arasında oluşmuş kopukluğu gidermeye hizmet eder. Bu bildiri odak noktası olarak, yüce deneyiminde şiir kişisinde gerçekleşen psişik metamorfozu alır. Bu çalışmada yüce deneyiminin Lacan’ınjouissanceolarak adlandırdığı bilinçdışı haz deneyimiyle örtüştüğü fikrinden yola çıkılarak, şiir kişisinin simgeseldeki konumundan, imgeleminin etkisiyle, ego ideali düzleminin kısa bir süreliğine bozulduğu imgesel bir boyuta geçtiği savunulur

Subject Keywords

Burke, Lacan, Yüce, Jouissance, Sublime

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/83997

Conference Name

4th Language, Culture and Literature Symposium (2018)

Collections

Department of Foreign Language Education, Conference / Seminar

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

The concept of self in the context of the "despisers of the body" alluded in nietzsche's thus spoke zarathustra Yazıcı, Irmak; İnam, Ahmet; Department of Philosophy (2008) This thesis analyses the concept of self with respect to Nietzsche’s (1844- 1900) implications on the “despisers of the body” in Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Nietzsche’s exposition of the self as a varying multiplicity neither within nor out of the body is the basic assumption of this dissertation. In this sense, the place of Nietzschean self considering the evolution of the concept of self through history will be analyzed. The concept of ego (subject) will be discussed as Nietzsche’s critique of the so-called m...
The anarchy of justice: Hesiod’s Chaos, Anaximander’s apeiron, and geometric thought Grıffıth, James Edmond Carr (2022-04-01) This article examines Hesiod’s Chaos and Anaximander’s apeiron individually and inrelation to each other through the frame of René Descartes’ notion of natural geometry andthrough bounds and limits in Euclid and Immanuel Kant. Thanks to this frame, it shows that, inhis poetic vision, Hesiod saw in Chaos the act of bounding such that different things can appearwhile, in his speculative vision, Anaximander saw in the apeiron the self-limiting limit ofbounded things, which is to say, time as distinct from the ...
The Imaginary and Descartes’s Paradoxical Rationality İbrahimhakkıoğlu, Fulden (2018-05-01) The imaginary plays a distinctive role in Descartes’ writings. While its place is often articulated in negative terms (as that which is illusory or deceptive), it nonetheless serves as an important ground for the Cartesian project to unfold. Descartes’ search for clear and distinct ideas takes place through reason’s interplay with the imaginary. While its reliability as a source of knowledge is ultimately dismissed, the imaginary is that which is never truly mastered or overcome. It is a source of dread and...
The growing desert: nihilism and metaphysics in Martin Heidegger's thought Duman, Musa; İnam, Ahmet; Department of Philosophy (2009) In this study, we explore Heidegger’s understanding of nihilism as the essential dimension of metaphysics, of metaphysical experience of Being, and in the following, we address his responses to it. Heidegger takes nihilism as rooted in the metaphysical way of thinking, hence metaphysics and nihilism standing in a primordial identity. Such metaphysical way of thinking as a framework in which Being is experinced and articulated, explicitly or implicitly in all areas of Western culture, from art to science, gi...
THE CONCEPT OF AKRASIA IN ANCIENT GREEK PHILOSOPHY: PLATO, ARISTOTLE, AND THE STOICS Akkökler Karatekeli, Büşra; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2022-9) This thesis investigates the concept of akrasia, with particular attention given to its sundry interpretations in the philosophies of Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoics. In this inquiry, I argue that these philosophers agree on the lack of knowledge of the akratic person, while they differentiate from each other as to what this missing knowledge is. Irrespective of their rejection or acknowledgement of akrasia due to their conceptions of the soul, I argue that Plato, Aristotle and the Stoics share the common ...

Citation Formats

N. Birlik, “Edmund Burke’de Yüce ve Jouissance, Lacancı bir okuma,” Antalya, Türkiye, 2018, p. 1, Accessed: 00, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/83997.