Governance of mobility :contested territoriality political vacuum and state rescaling

This paper will argue that governance of mobility is the most challenging, and yet the most important task a political authority is to undertake if it is to exist. Territoriality, as a set of spatially constituted political control strategies (over a given population as well as the resources located on a piece of land), is there to ensure that mobilities remain under the control of a given political authority. Yet, this control is a fragile one and is to be reproduced on a continuous basis. There are also non-spatial/sectoral measures developed/implemented to complement the territorial strategies. The challenges to the governance of mobility are manyfold. They are rooted in two factors that constantly generate mobility and mobile subjects (such as inmigrants, immigrants, and refugees): a) the dynamics of capitalism, which constantly reshape the geographies upon which contemporary political authories commit themselves to run, at an increasing speed and intensity in the midst of globalisation and neoliberalism; b) the (global/regional) disputes/conflicts that unsettle the imagined and/or actually existing communities upon which these authorities establish themselves in discursive and geographical terms (including but not restricted to religious/ethnic rifts of domestic/global nature and the struggle among various global/regional powers to control the territories these authorities previously controlled). In those regards, governance of mobility is about reducing the political vacuum generated by the above factors to a minimum. State rescaling, in that regard, is a critical battlefield for both the authorities and for their contenders. Their target is to fill in that political vacuum to their own advantage. Yet, the fight between the authority and the contender(s) could well create a policy vacuum by destroying both’s problem solving capacity, which would otherwise ensure the well-being and the survival of the subjects (real humans) over whom they fight to determine their future. The arguments put forward will be developed with reference to two recent and burning political issues hitting Turkey: the recent round of Kurdish uprising and the Syrian conflict (and the refugee crisis).
City Debates 2016, (2 - 04 Mart 2016)


Democracy to become reality: Participatory planning through action research
Ataov, Anh (Elsevier BV, 2007-09-01)
Different approaches in participatory planning stem from argumentation that stresses a certain model of democracy. While each model promotes participatory conditions, they do not always become reality. The needs of today's communities and the complex political system require a different approach for participatory planning to operate in a democratic way. This paper argues that five conditions are salient and illustrates the empirical consequences of this position by using the experiences of participatory mov...
Historical analysis of state intervention into spaces of social opposition: the case of Ankara
Suher, Banu Melis; Ersoy, Melih; Department of Urban Policy Planning and Local Governments (2014)
Urban space is the ultimate source for examining the contradiction between political authority and social opposition. As an efficient ground for manipulating social processes, urban space is subjected to a number of interventions of political power directly or indirectly. Hence, the authority leads the process of depoliticization on space via two channels. Firstly, it transforms the physical configuration of the place by public policy instruments. Thus, the reflection of hegemony on spatial ground becomes p...
Modeling and assessment of the effectiveness of government information systems
Güçlü, Aydın Nusret; Bilgen, Semih; Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (2011)
In the context of evaluating effectiveness of information systems, the public sector requires a specific approach for measuring indirect benefits such as strategic / political value. There is not yet a holistic approach and no unified adaptive and time-variant model addressing the problem. In this thesis, Strategic Management Model developed and partially applied at the Ministry of Finance, Turkey, is described. The model is based on the public value delivery chain, from strategic goals to accountability re...
Politics and Planning When Planning Becomes a Means of Political Struggle
Eraydın, Ayda (2016-07-02)
The implications of politics on planning systems and process are a well-studied subject, which makes us to understand how politics manifests itself in the planning contents, while the role of planning in the politics deserves further attention. The literature on politics and planning emphasises the power structures and political combinations in order to explain how decisions on urban built environment is brought about and by whom they are shaped (Savitch, 1998; Savitch and Kantor, 2002). Politicians, techn...
Coexistence of continuity and change in institutional work
Topal, Çağrı (Emerald, 2020-01-01)
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to answer the question of how continuity and change coexist in the work of institutional actors who can combine maintenance, disruption and/or creation. Past studies mention this coexistence without an explanation. Design/methodology/approach The paper develops a perspective through literature review. Findings Institutional actors are both socialized into the norm-oriented space of continuity and maintenance through their reciprocal relations and associated social knowle...
Citation Formats
M. K. Bayırbağ, “Governance of mobility :contested territoriality political vacuum and state rescaling,” presented at the City Debates 2016, (2 - 04 Mart 2016), Beirut, Lebanon, 2016, Accessed: 00, 2021. [Online]. Available: