The Logic of Gilles Deleuze: Basic Principles

Date

2021-01-01

Author

Shores, Corry Michael

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

324
views

0
downloads

French philosopher Gilles Deleuze wrote two 'logic' books: Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation and The Logic of Sense. However, in neither of these books nor in any other works does Deleuze articulate in a formal way the features of the logic he employs. He certainly does not use classical logic. And the best options for the non-classical logic that he may be implementing are: fuzzy, intuitionist, and many-valued. These are applicable to his concepts of heterogeneous composition and becoming, affirmative synthetic disjunction, and powers of the false. In The Logic of Gilles Deleuze: Basic Principles, Corry Shores examines the applicability of three non-classical logics to Deleuze's philosophy, by building from the philosophical and logical writings of Graham Priest, the world's leading proponent of dialetheism. Through so doing, Shores argues that Deleuze's logic is best understood as a dialetheic, paraconsistent, many-valued logic.

URI

https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/logic-of-gilles-deleuze-9781350062269/
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/93824

Collections

Department of Philosophy, Book / Book chapter

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

The value of sociability in Rousseau, Hegel, and Nietzsche Karatekeli, Emre; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2021-5) This thesis investigates the political philosophies of Rousseau, Hegel, and Nietzsche, as regards the relation between sociability and freedom. Firstly, I argue that Rousseau’s fundamental view undergoes a drastic shift in that while in the Second Discourse he regards the human being as essentially individualistic, in the Social Contract he dismisses egoism and argues for the establishment of sociability in the name of general will to materialise human freedom. Secondly, I discuss how Hegel proves the neces...
The visual formation of cartesian subject in modern metaphysics : a critique of Cogito philosophy Ganioğlu, Zafer; Akçay, Ali Adnan; Department of Sociology (2006) This thesis scrutinizes modern metaphysics through a specific reading and critique of Cartesian Philosophy. In the study, the concepts of metaphysics, ideology, modernity, subject and modern science are re-examined in their relations among them and in that the peculiarity of modern metaphysics is attempted to be revealed. At the core of the thesis, Descartes’ understanding of subject is inquired to be modern subject, and its role in the transformations happened in Western world with the advent of modern age...
The place of human subject in Foucault's and Deleuze's philosophies Taner, Erdem; Ergüden, Akın; Department of Philosophy (2005) The main objective of this master̕s thesis is to analyze the place assigned to human subjectivity by French philosophers Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze. In order to fulfil the requirements of this objective, what is focused on is their shared critique which is exercised against the traditional conceptions of humanity and subjectivity. Through the thesis, first Foucault̕s analyses which demonstrate that universal man as a construction emerges as an effect of discursive practices and power relations, and ...
An attempt to understand Hume's philosophy of religion Özdemir, Halise; Sayan, Erdinç; Department of Philosophy (2006) IN THIS THESIS I ARGUE THAT DAVID HUME DEVELOPED A PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION AS AN EMPRICIST AND A NATURALIST PHILOSOPHER, AND DEFENDED HIS PHILOSOPHY AGAINST THE RATIONALIST TRADITION.
THE CONCEPT OF AKRASIA IN ANCIENT GREEK PHILOSOPHY: PLATO, ARISTOTLE, AND THE STOICS Akkökler Karatekeli, Büşra; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2022-9) This thesis investigates the concept of akrasia, with particular attention given to its sundry interpretations in the philosophies of Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoics. In this inquiry, I argue that these philosophers agree on the lack of knowledge of the akratic person, while they differentiate from each other as to what this missing knowledge is. Irrespective of their rejection or acknowledgement of akrasia due to their conceptions of the soul, I argue that Plato, Aristotle and the Stoics share the common ...

Citation Formats

C. M. Shores, The Logic of Gilles Deleuze: Basic Principles. 2021.