Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Development of Argumentation Based Concept Cartoons for Socioscientific Issues: A Case of Science and Art Centers
Download
index.pdf
Date
2022-1-01
Author
ATASOY, ŞENGÜL
Tekbıyık, Ahmet
Çalık, Muammer
Yılmaz Tüzün, Özgül
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
146
views
163
downloads
Cite This
All rights reserved.In the present study, argumentation based concept cartoons for socioscientific issues (CCSSI) were designed for students enrolled in Science and Art Centers (SACs), and the results of the implementation were evaluated. The education design, which adopted the Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE) model, was implemented in three stages. In the first stage, a framework plan was developed for the socioscientific issues (SSI) to generate concept cartoons. For each SSI in the framework plan the probable decisions (positive and negative), informal reasoning modes, and argument components (such as claim, evidence, counter argument and rebuttal) were determined. In the second stage, for argumentation based SSI teaching, the concept cartoons were generated and expert opinions were obtained. In the third phase the following issues were accomplished: teachers working at a SAC attended an inservice training program, a learning group was established, concept cartoons were exhibited on school corridors and simultaneously dialogic discussions were held in class. To collect data a questionnaire, interview forms, a rubric, and an observation form were utilized. Qualitative data were analyzed by means of descriptive analysis. Findings revealed that the framework plan was functional but the CCSSI needed some improvements. Based on the experts' recommendations, the CCSSI was revised and then implemented. Observations showed that the teachers achieved the expected criteria at various levels ranging from monologic to dialogic. Thus, it is recommended that further studies are needed to enrich in-class dialogic discussions for teachers and students. Moreover, it is suggested that the framework plan can be used in other disciplines and grades.
Subject Keywords
Socioscientific issues
,
Argumentation
,
Concept cartoons
,
The ADDIE model
,
Science and arts centers
,
SOCIO-SCIENTIFIC ISSUES
,
DECISION-MAKING
,
EPISTEMOLOGICAL BELIEFS
,
STUDENTS UNDERSTANDINGS
,
GROUP DISCUSSIONS
,
LEARNING-METHOD
,
CLIMATE-CHANGE
,
EDUCATION
,
CONTEXT
,
KNOWLEDGE
,
Argumentation
,
Concept cartoons
,
Science and arts centers
,
Socioscientific issues
,
The ADDIE model
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/101811
Journal
Egitim ve Bilim
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2022.11327
Collections
Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Article
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
Use of self-determination theory to support basic psychological needs of preservice science teachers in an environmental science course
Karaarslan, Guliz; Ertepinar, Hamide; Sungur, Semra (2013-06-01)
In this paper, we examine how the basic psychological needs of preservice science teachers (PSTs) were supported in a series of environmental science course activities informed by self-determination theory (SDT). We collected qualitative data about the PSTs' sense of competence, autonomy, and relatedness through interviews, group discussions, assignments, and reflection papers. Data were analyzed in relation to the instructional design features of the course; namely, collective construction of ideas, studen...
Quality of preservice teachers argumentation in socioscientific issues context
KARIŞAN KORUCU, DİLEK; Yılmaz Tüzün, Özgül; Zeidler, Dana Lewis (2017-10-01)
This study aimed to explore preservice teachers’ (PTs) argumentation quality during socioscientific issues (SSI) based classroom discussions. The participants of the study were 20 PTs from the Department of Elementary Education at a large, research oriented public university in Turkey. Qualitative case study method was used in this study. The study covered four socioscientific issues (food additives, alternative energy sources, climate change, and the industrial revolution). Each issue was discussed in the ...
Middle Scool Students' Informal Reasoning Quality, Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues and Motivation to Learn Science
Manay, Büşra; Yılmaz Tüzün, Özgül; Department of Secondary Science and Mathematics Education (2022-12-2)
The aim of the present study was investigating the relationship between students’ informal reasoning quality regarding socio-scientific issues (SSI), attitudes toward SSI and their motivation to learn science. Data were obtained by using Informal Reasoning on SSI questionnaire, Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Socio-scientific Issues (PASSI) and Students’ Motivation toward Science Learning (SMTSL). The participants were 523 middle school students in 7th and 8th grades in Artuklu district of Mardin. Correlational ...
Middle school students’ informal reasoning modes and argumentation quality in socioscientific issues: epistemological beliefs and issue familiarity as predictors
Uygun, Cansu Başak; Yılmaz Tüzün, Özgül; Department of Science Education (2022-6)
The purpose of this study was to examine middle school students’ informal reasoning modes, and argumentation quality regarding three different SSI, namely, space explorations (SPE), genetically modified organisms (GMO), and nuclear power plants (NPP); and to investigate how well middle school students’ epistemological beliefs (the dimensions of source/certainty, development, and justification) and issue familiarity predict their informal reasoning modes and argumentation quality. For this purpose, correlati...
Developing effective socioscientific issues teaching practices through educational design research
Irmak, Meltem; Yılmaz Tüzün, Özgül; Yürük, Nejla; Department of Elementary Education (2018)
The main purpose of this study was to develop pre-service science teachers’ (PSTs) effective socioscientific issues (SSI) teaching practices with technology by activating their metacognition. For this purpose, educational design research was utilized to re-design an undergraduate course. Re-designed course was implemented in the fall semester of 2014-2015 with 36 participants. In light of the results of the data obtained in the first implementation, expert reviews and the related literature, the design of t...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
Ş. ATASOY, A. Tekbıyık, M. Çalık, and Ö. Yılmaz Tüzün, “Development of Argumentation Based Concept Cartoons for Socioscientific Issues: A Case of Science and Art Centers,”
Egitim ve Bilim
, vol. 47, no. 211, pp. 323–367, 2022, Accessed: 00, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/101811.