Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Free will and determinism: are they even relevant to each other?
Download
index.pdf
Date
2012
Author
Çağatay, Hasan
Metadata
Show full item record
Item Usage Stats
298
views
90
downloads
Cite This
Many philosophers tend to defend the view that there is a significant relation between the problem of determinism / indeterminism and the problem of free will. The belief that there exists such a significant relation is supported by our intuitions; however, in this thesis, I defend just the opposite view: free will has no significant dependence on the deterministic or indeterministic character of causal relations. In the same way, I propose that the question, whether or not determinism is true, cannot be answered based on observations about the problem of free will. I believe that the genuine question whose answer would illuminate the darkness surrounding free will is whether or not will supervenes on anything other than itself. Therefore, in order to decide whether or not we are free, the question we should ask is “Does will supervene upon something other than itself?” Moreover, I defend the position that no matter whether the world is deterministic or indeterministic, if physicalism is true, i.e. if properties of free will supervene upon physical properties, then we cannot enjoy genuine freedom. The position of the thesis has some important ethical implications: If we cannot be genuinely free, we cannot be genuinely responsible for our actions either. This implies that retributive and admirative desires towards other persons are rationally untenable. I defend the view that only practical attitudes like reinforcement and punishment or isolation and inclusion are rationally tenable.
Subject Keywords
Free will and determinism.
URI
http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12614162/index.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/21491
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
Freedom in the social context: the positions of Aristotle and Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Aytemir, Nesil; Ceylan, Yasin; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2018)
This thesis aims at examining and comparing the concept of freedom in the social context from the viewpoints of Aristotle (384–322 BC) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778). In order to do that, Aristotle’s ideas on slavery, the position of women in city-state, freedom of citizens, and democracy are emphasized for his position; and Rousseau’s ideas on state of nature, social contract theory, and ideal education are stressed on for his position. As both Aristotle and Rousseau mainly seek for an ideal system ...
Özgür irade ve belirlenimcilik ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlaması ve psikometrik özellikleri.
Alper, Sinan; Sümer, Nebi (2017-07-01)
Özgür irade ve belirlenimciliğe olan inanç günlük hayattaki birçok davranışı etkilemektedir. Kültürel özelliklerden etkilenen ilgili inançların güvenilir ve geçerli şekilde ölçülmesi araştırmacılar için önem taşımaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, Türkçeye henüz uyarlanmamış olan Özgür İrade ve Belirlenimcilik Ölçeği’ni (FAD-Plus; Paulhus ve Carey, 2011) Türkçeye uyarlamak ve psikometrik özelliklerini değerlendirmektir. Üniversite öğrencilerinden (N = 403) toplanan veri üzerinde yapılan faktör analizi sonucund...
Nietzsche on fate and freedom
Beşkardeşler, Sedef; Parkan, Barış; Department of Philosophy (2013)
At face value, Nietzsche’s approach to the problem of free will may seem contradictory since he rejects both free will and determinism. However, a detailed analysis of Nietzsche’s texts will show that, while he uncovers the traditional and psychological background of both the belief in free will and unfree will, he develops his unique understanding of freedom and fate. To state more precisely, Nietzsche repudiates both an understanding of free will which is claimed to be a priorily possessed and also an ide...
Kant’s transcendental freedom
Başaran, Burcu; Parkan, Barış; Department of Philosophy (2015)
The aim of this study is to initiate a discussion on the reconciliation of freedom and natural causality in Immanuel Kant’s major work Critique of Pure Reason. In the Third Antinomy, Kant problematizes transcendental freedom as the reason of the conflict between causality of freedom and of nature. While the thesis of the Third Antinomy claims that transcendental freedom does not contradict natural causality, the antithesis of the Third Antinomy claims that it contradicts natural causality in the field of ap...
Bergson’s method of intuition: towards a philosophy of life /
Koçkan, Zöhre; Çırakman, Elif; Department of Philosophy (2014)
The purpose of this study is to show how a possible philosophy of life can arise by following Bergson’s method of intuition and to make emphasis on how Bergson’s two fundamental notions (intuition and duration) are capable of grasping the flux of life. The scientific methods, static concepts and classical philosophy are not able to understand the flow of life. Throughout this study it is pointed out a possible philosophy that is able to grasp the flow and the evolution of life. For this aim, Bergson’s metho...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
H. Çağatay, “Free will and determinism: are they even relevant to each other? ,” Ph.D. - Doctoral Program, Middle East Technical University, 2012.
