Freedom in the social context: the positions of Aristotle and Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Download

index.pdf

Date

2018

Author

Aytemir, Nesil

Metadata

Show full item record

Item Usage Stats

819
views

171
downloads

This thesis aims at examining and comparing the concept of freedom in the social context from the viewpoints of Aristotle (384–322 BC) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778). In order to do that, Aristotle’s ideas on slavery, the position of women in city-state, freedom of citizens, and democracy are emphasized for his position; and Rousseau’s ideas on state of nature, social contract theory, and ideal education are stressed on for his position. As both Aristotle and Rousseau mainly seek for an ideal system on the basis of city-state, and thereby its concomitants of “virtuous citizens”, the primary aim of this thesis is to analyse and compare their ideas on human nature, citizenship, woman, and education in order to discuss the concept of freedom in the social context.

Subject Keywords

Free will and determinism.

URI

http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12622198/index.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/27363

Collections

Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

Free will and determinism: are they even relevant to each other? Çağatay, Hasan; Grünberg, Teo; Department of Philosophy (2012) Many philosophers tend to defend the view that there is a significant relation between the problem of determinism / indeterminism and the problem of free will. The belief that there exists such a significant relation is supported by our intuitions; however, in this thesis, I defend just the opposite view: free will has no significant dependence on the deterministic or indeterministic character of causal relations. In the same way, I propose that the question, whether or not determinism is true, cannot be an...
Kant’s transcendental freedom Başaran, Burcu; Parkan, Barış; Department of Philosophy (2015) The aim of this study is to initiate a discussion on the reconciliation of freedom and natural causality in Immanuel Kant’s major work Critique of Pure Reason. In the Third Antinomy, Kant problematizes transcendental freedom as the reason of the conflict between causality of freedom and of nature. While the thesis of the Third Antinomy claims that transcendental freedom does not contradict natural causality, the antithesis of the Third Antinomy claims that it contradicts natural causality in the field of ap...
Labor, leisure and freedom in the philosophies of Aristotle, Karl Marx and Herbert Marcuse Kılınç, Doğan Barış; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2006) The aim of this study is to present an examination of the philosophies of Aristotle, Karl Marx and Herbert Marcuse concerning labor and leisure in the context of freedom. These philosophers have paid attention to the concepts labor and leisure; their view of freedom is dependent on the relationship they have established between labor and leisure. To this end, I firstly give a general overview of the concepts labor, leisure and freedom; afterwards, I try to show how these concepts have been considered in the...
Freedom and creativity in Bergson's Philosophy Özyurt, Esen; Parkan, Barış; Department of Philosophy (2013) The purpose of this study is to make sense of the notion of freedom in Bergson‘s philosophy. Bergson‘s original approach to the problem of free will is the application of the notion of duration to solve this problem. For Bergson, the problem of free will arises from a misconceived framework which is based on reducing time to space. Throughout the thesis, we tried to show how the notion of duration allows Bergson to reformulate and solve the problem of free will. For that purpose the method of intuition as t...
Human nature, ethics and politics in the philosophies of Thomas Hobbes and Immanuel Kant Yağanak, Eray; Turan, Şeref Halil; Department of Philosophy (2013) The aim of this study is to make a comparison between Thomas Hobbes’ and Immanuel Kant’s theories of human nature, ethics and politics. This thesis defends the arguments of Kant’s republican political theory against the claims raised by Hobbes. In this thesis, I shall argue that Hobbes’ empiricist/mechanistic understanding of human nature cannot provide freedom of action for human beings within his ethical and political theory. In contrast to Hobbes, I shall defend the thesis that Kant’s understanding of hu...

Citation Formats

N. Aytemir, “Freedom in the social context: the positions of Aristotle and Jean-Jacques Rousseau,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2018.