Knowledge after the End of Nature: A Critical Approach to Allen's Concept of Artifactuality

2019-05-01
Bektas, Sezen
Barry Allen's criticism of the traditional definition of knowledge seems to share a radical tone with Stephan Vogel's concerns about the customary representation of the causes that lie behind our current environmental problems. Both philosophers voice their complaints about the Cartesian picture of the world and dismiss the core idea behind the notorious duality embedded in that picture. What they propose instead is a monistic perspective positing an artifactual networking. In this paper, I will try to draw attention to certain weak aspects of Allen's refreshing description of knowledge as "superlative artifactual performance" and offer a way to improve that characterization via Vogel's notion "wildness". More specifically, I will propose a solution to the problems pertaining to the distinction between good and bad artifacts with respect to the epistemic criteria proposed by Allen, and claim that the temporal gap standing in between the expectations of a designer and the qualities of her design may contribute to our understanding of the nature of an artifact. I maintain that each creative attempt to know a given artifact is to be appreciated by recognizing its different uses. In doing so, I will also try to show why and how certain bad artifacts get their undesirable status because of leading up to techno-cultural stagnation.
ORGANON F

Suggestions

Almost definite causal theories
Dogandag, S; Ferraris, P; Lifschitz, V (2004-01-01)
The language of nonmonotonic causal theories, defined by Norman McCain and Hudson Turner, is an important formalism for representing properties of actions. For causal theories of a special kind, called definite, a simple translation into the language of logic programs under the answer set semantics is available. In this paper we define a similar translation for causal theories of a more general form, called almost definite. Such theories can be used, for instance, to characterize the transitive closure of a...
Critique of epistemic externalism and defense of foundationalist internalism
Altuğ, Ali Haydar; Ceylan, Yasin; Department of Philosophy (2015)
This thesis argues that epistemic externalism is untenable and defends that, although facing some severe problems, internalism is the only possible remaining option for a theory of knowledge and justification. It defends a foundationalist version of internalism, in which one’s beliefs about her own state of mind are taken to be certain. In this way, together with propositions of logic and mathematics, foundationalist requirement of certain and basic beliefs is rendered. Further, based on Laurence Bonjour’s ...
Novel discourse and institutional legitimation: The rhetorical construction of Alberta’s bitumen bubble
Gephart, Robert; Suddaby, Roy; Topal, Çağrı; Savall, Amandine (2015-03-11)
We use an interpretive perspective to understand the construction of a novel discursive entity – Alberta’s “bitumen bubble” --in public discourse. This bubble or gap between forecast and actual oil prices was destined to result in “six billion dollars less in revenue this year alone” for Alberta according to Premier Allison Redford. To explore the discursive construction of this novel entity, we analyzed: 1) the 2012 Alberta budget speech preceding the bubble’s invention, 2) Premier Redford’s speech announc...
Temporary architecture : the serpentine gallery pavilions
Tunçbilek, Gonca Zeynep; Savaş Sargın, Ayşen; Department of Architecture (2013)
This thesis is a critical inquiry into conceptualizations of the term ‘temporality’ in architectural discourse. It is geared towards the expanding definition of the ‘temporariness’ as a pragmatic and intellectual source for architectural production. The Serpentine Gallery Pavilions between 2000 and 2012, given their acute embodiment of the concept of temporality, will be the subject and the object of this thesis. The Serpentine Gallery has provided the setting for annual pavilion design project since 2000, ...
LEVEL OF ANALYSIS AND UNIT OF ANALYSIS - A CASE FOR DISTINCTION
Yurdusev, Ahmet Nuri (SAGE Publications, 1993-03-01)
This paper takes the view that the 'level of analysis' problem, first posed by Singer (1961), has not been discussed to the extent that it deserves in the literature of International Relations. The concepts of the 'level of analysis' and the 'unit of analysis' have widely been used interchangeably. The author attempts to make a distinction between the 'level of analysis' and the 'unit of analysis', arguing that the 'level of analysis' is an issue of how to study (methodology and context) and the 'unit of ...
Citation Formats
S. Bektas, “Knowledge after the End of Nature: A Critical Approach to Allen’s Concept of Artifactuality,” ORGANON F, pp. 249–264, 2019, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/64039.