Lexical features in argumentative writing across English writers from different language backgrounds

Date

2020-04-01

Author

Yu, Xiaoli

Metadata

Show full item record

Item Usage Stats

323
views

0
downloads

This corpus-based research analysed three lexical features (lexical diversity, lexical sophistication, and cohesion) in English argumentative writing and examined the potential differences in lexical performance (1) between native and nonnative English writers and (2) across all writers from various language backgrounds. The findings revealed that nonnative English writers demonstrated significantly lower performance in lexical sophistication than did native English writers. Significant differences in all three lexical aspects exist between writers from different language backgrounds. Pedagogical implications for vocabulary instruction in academic writing for nonnative writers include emphasizing the mastery of academic, low-frequency, and discipline-specific vocabulary. Additionally, improving nonnative writers’ vocabulary size and lexical diversity is essential for building deeper level cohesion in writing. The results suggest unique writing characteristics of different nonnative writers and their varied learner needs should be acknowledged. Thus, targeted instruction is essential to provide effective enhancement to nonnative English writers’ lexical performance in academic writing.

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/79621

Journal

Journal of Second Language Studies

Collections

Department of Foreign Language Education, Article

Suggestions

OpenMETU
Core

Lexical Features in Argumentative Writing across English Writers from Different Language Backgrounds Yu, Xiaoli (2019-09-12) This corpus-based research analysed three lexical features (lexical diversity, lexical sophistication, and cohesion) in English argumentative writing and examined the potential differences in lexical performance 1) between native and nonnative English writers and 2) across all writers from seven language backgrounds. Two major research questions guided the analyses in the current study: 1. Are there significant differences in lexical features between native and nonnative argumentative English writing, ...
Authorial identity in Turkish language and English language research articles in Sociology: The role of publication context in academic writers' discourse choices Isik-Tas, Elvan Eda (2018-01-01) Few studies to date have investigated the role of publication context in shaping academic writers' linguistic choices in establishing authorial identity in different writing cultures. This study explores how authorial identity is represented through first person pronouns in 130 Sociology research articles (RAs) in Turkish and in English published in national and international journals. Both corpus-based and interview-based analyses were employed. Three sub-corpora were analyzed: (1) Turkish writers' Turkish...
Morphological processing of inflected and derived words in L1 Turkish and L2 English Şafak, Duygu Fatma; Kırkıcı, Bilal; Department of English Language Teaching (2015) The present study aims at examining how inflected and derived words are processed during the early stages of visual word recognition in a native language (L1) and in a second language (L2). A second aim of the study is to find out whether or not the semantic and surface-form properties of morphologically complex words affect early word recognition processes. Two masked priming experiments were conducted to investigate morphological processing in L1 Turkish and in L2 English. In the first experiment, 40 L1 s...
Two-level comparisons of lexical features in academic writing between native and nonnative writers and across nonnative writers Yu, Xiaoli (2018-03-12) ased on Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis (CIA) framework, this ongoing corpus-based study analyzes the differences of lexical features in academic writings 1) between nonnative and native English writers and 2) across nonnative writers from various language backgrounds. The International Corpus of Learner English (ICLE) and the Louvain Corpus of Native Essay Writing (LOCNESS) are employed to represent nonnative and native writings respectively. Six mother tongue backgrounds are selected from the ICLE to r...
Diacritics correction in Turkish with context-aware sequence to sequence modeling Köksal, Asiye Tuba; Bozal, Özge; Özge, Umut (2022-1-01) Digital texts in many languages have examples of missing or misused diacritics which makes it hard for natural language processing applications to disambiguate the meaning of words. Therefore, diacritics restoration is a crucial step in natural language processing applications for many languages. In this study we approach this problem as bidirectional transformation of diacritical letters and their ASCII counterparts, rather than unidirectional diacritic restoration. We propose a context-aware character-lev...

Citation Formats

X. Yu, “Lexical features in argumentative writing across English writers from different language backgrounds,” Journal of Second Language Studies, pp. 82–110, 2020, Accessed: 00, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/79621.