Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
A comparison of roadside design approaches in terms of road safety to improve Turkish roadside safety standards
Download
10472896.pdf
Date
2022-5-31
Author
Betus, Yakup
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
316
views
411
downloads
Cite This
When an errant vehicle runs off the road, crashing into objects/ reaching places in the vicinity creates “run-off-road (ROR)” accidents, which may result in severe injuries or fatalities. Roadside designs with proper Road Restraint Systems (RRS) ideally should cause neither hazards to the third parties nor threats to the vehicle users. The major components of the RRSs are the Vehicle Restraint Systems (VRS), including the safety barriers (i.e., guardrails) designed to i) either stop the errant vehicle fully or ii) slow it down for a safe return to the lane or less severe crash. There are national or regional standards for RRS (i.e., NCHRP-350, AASHTO MASH, and EN1317) mainly define the systems, classifications, and acceptance tests. However, there are no standardized methods/tools for the design and application specifications of RRS (i.e., type, location, length of need, etc.) since they are mostly correlated with the geometric design standards of the roads, which vary across countries, socio-economic characteristics of the road users and infrastructure planning principles. While intercity road design principles in Turkey are mostly adopted from the AASHTO codes in the US, the clear zone concept (verge/green zone in the UK) is not fully employed in Turkish road designs; it does not follow a standardized cross-section for different types/functions of roads as in the UK or Germany, either. Furthermore, Turkey's RRS design must follow the European region EN1317 standards. Current intercity roadside design in Turkey is a mix of the USA principles embedded into a rule-based approach, which is a simplified version of the German roadside design approach. This creates a unique challenge in the design and implementation of the road sides, especially in the absence of the Road Safety Audit (RSA) process. The high share of RORs in Turkey, in the order of 15%-20% of the fatal and injury accidents every year, so it is necessary to improve the roadside designs. This thesis compares current Turkish practice with a newly proposed roadside design approach adopted from the UK approach, which also follows the same EN standards for the RSS and relies on a systematic assessment procedure for major highways (speeds higher than 90 km/h and traffic volumes greater than 5,000 veh/days). The comparisons are made over a study corridor of 15 kilometers for the safety barrier along (the nearside of) the road. Both length of needs and locations of the applications are compared between alternative approaches to understand the differences better. The new approach required the N2 containment level for most sections of the corridor, which provides a lower containment level than the H1 required by the current practice. However, the total length of safety barriers needed by the new approach was almost 2.5 times the length of the current practice, showing significant differences between the two approaches. By considering the more objective evaluation criteria of the proposed approach, a series of recommendations was provided for improving traffic safety in Turkey via safer roadside designs.
Subject Keywords
Roadside safety
,
Roadside design
,
Road safety
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/98105
Collections
Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Thesis
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
An approach to investigate relationship between speed and safety on urban arterials
Ardiç Eminağa, Zerrin; Akyılmaz, M. Özdemir; Department of Civil Engineering (2008)
Traffic safety is an important problem in today’s world with increasing number of fatalities and injuries in traffic accidents. For the solution of this problem, determination of accident prone locations on a network and reasons behind is an essential step, which is studied to some extend via different traffic accident analyses in the literature. While major factors affecting accident risk, such as speed, congestion, infrastructural aspects are known, it is still very difficult to figure out the interaction...
Improving road safety awareness through experiential learning: an action research with preschool children
Demiray Sandıraz, Betül; Ok, Ahmet; Department of Educational Sciences (2020)
Children are one of the highest risk groups in traffic injuries and casualties. All around the world, many countries try to decrease hazardous situations concerning traffic through environmental, structural, and educational adjustments. Road safety education is critical to increase awareness of children as pedestrians, bicyclists, passengers, and future vehicle drivers. The purpose of this action research is to analyze the effects of a road safety teaching unit developed by the researcher based on experient...
Examining the approaches of OHS professionals to the reasons for falls from height
Akarsu, Deniz; Özkan, Türker; Department of Occupational Health and Safety (2019)
Except motor vehicles accidents, the death rate on occupational accidents which occur falling from high places or into depths, is higher than any other accidents. According to the importance of the topic, in the study, examining the approaches of OHS professionals to the reasons and effects of occupational accidents which occur as falling from heights is aimed. For this, 100 accident inspection reports from Labor Inspection Board were surveyed. Accident reasons were derived from those reports. Those reasons...
A Macrolevel tabu-search based approach to determine the major factors in built environment-traffic safety relationship
Alişan, Onur; Babalık, Ela; Department of City and Regional Planning (2021-3-05)
Traffic crashes are a significant contributing factor to fatalities globally, with an increasing pace of crashes occurring in urban areas. Thus, this study aims to analyze the relationship between urban built environment and traffic safety (BE-TS) to reveal the factors that threaten TS so that they could be avoided in early planning phases. BE was operationalized through the D-classification (e.g., density and diversity) whereas, TS was operationalized through varying crash categories (e.g., severity) and r...
The effect of road safety advertisements on speeding behavior over time: A simulator study
Özkan, Özgün; Özkan, Türker; Department of Psychology (2022-3)
Countermeasures to prevent death and injury in traffic are important for traffic safety. Human error is a critical component associated with road traffic accidents. Therefore, various organizations and decision-makers are trying to prevent risky behaviors via different methods. One of the most used methods of raising awareness and creating behavioral change is traffic safety campaign videos. The focus of the present study is speeding, which is one of the most dangerous violations on the road. The study aime...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
Y. Betus, “A comparison of roadside design approaches in terms of road safety to improve Turkish roadside safety standards,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2022.