Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Illegitimate tasks are not created equal: Examining the effects of attributions on unreasonable and unnecessary tasks
Date
2019-07-03
Author
Pindek, Shani
Demircioglu, Ezgi
Howard, David J.
Eatough, Erin M.
Spector, Paul E.
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
272
views
0
downloads
Cite This
Illegitimate tasks are tasks that violate norms for what the employee should do as part of the job, and have been found to harm employees' well-being. The current research uses a mixed methods design to examine the role of attributions on the two types of illegitimate tasks: unreasonable and unnecessary tasks. A sample of 432 engineers described a specific illegitimate task that was assigned to them, the attributions they made and their response. They also completed a quantitative questionnaire. Results from both the qualitative (event level) and quantitative (person level) portions of our study portray differences in the attributions made to unreasonable and unnecessary tasks, as well as differential negative effects on employees' emotions. In addition, hostile attribution bias was found to moderate the relationship between illegitimate tasks and negative emotions, particularly for unreasonable tasks. This supports the theoretical basis for illegitimate tasks because unreasonable tasks pose a potentially greater risk to the employee's self-worth than unnecessary tasks that are more often assigned at random.
Subject Keywords
Illegitimate tasks
,
Attributions
,
Unreasonable tasks
,
Unnecessary tasks
,
Mixed methods
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/68211
Journal
WORK AND STRESS
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2018.1496160
Collections
Department of Psychology, Article
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
Moderating effect of perceived situational strength on the relationship between the dark triad and counterproductive work behaviors
Koçoğlu, Öykü; Toker, Yonca; The Department of Psychology (2020)
Counterproductive Work Behaviors (CWBs) can be defined as intentional and harmful behaviors of employees that are against the organization, members of the organization or both. The literature provides a link between CWBs and the Dark Triad personality traits which consist of three antagonistic traits: Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy. Individuals who are high on the Dark Triad characteristics engage in more deviant workplace behaviors than their non-dark themed counterparts. It was hypothesized...
Gender-congruent leadership style and prejudiced personality in relation with job/leader satisfaction and trust
Düzgün, Meltem; Toker, Yonca; Department of Psychology (2019)
Prejudice toward leaders might be problematic for employees and organizations because of its negative consequences for employees like lower job satisfaction or leader satisfaction. One of the reasons which can cause prejudiced attitudes toward leaders is the mismatch between gender roles and the leadership style displayed, as according to role congruity theory, employees expect their leaders to show behaviors consistent with their gender roles in society (Eagly & Karau, 2002). According to Altemeyer (1998),...
Justice Perceptions and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Moderating Role of Positive Affectivity
Acar, Feride Pınar (null; 2019-12-30)
Discretionary behaviors that are not dictated by formal job descriptions but that help the organization attain its objectives are commonly labelled as organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB). The extant OCB literature is limited, because most proposed models lack an integrative approach that considers both individual and organizational antecedents and their interactions. The present study attempts to fill this gap in the literature by proposing and testing a model of OCB that brings together organization...
Workplace bullying: its reflection upon organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior perceptions among public sector employees
Öztürk, Deniz; Aşcıgil, Semra Feriha; Department of Business Administration (2011)
The present study intends to examine the influence of workplace bullying incidents on the organizational justice perceptions of targets and by-standers with respect to organizational procedures, supervisory treatment and distribution of pay/reward schemes together with the performance of organizational citizenship behavior. For this purpose, six different public institutions in Ankara and Izmir are selected. A total of 288 white-collar public employees filled out the questionnaire where one third of the par...
Factors affecting job satisfaction of employees in a public institution
Unutmaz, Seda; Çilingir, Canan; Department of Industrial Engineering (2014)
In this study, it is aimed to determine important factors that affect the job satisfaction of employees working in a particular public institution and to investigate to what extent the public institution satisfies its employees. For this purpose, after extensive literature research, two different and subsidiary surveys, which are Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Survey and Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS), are conducted on the subject employee group. It is assumed that the subject employee group, which consist...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
S. Pindek, E. Demircioglu, D. J. Howard, E. M. Eatough, and P. E. Spector, “Illegitimate tasks are not created equal: Examining the effects of attributions on unreasonable and unnecessary tasks,”
WORK AND STRESS
, pp. 231–246, 2019, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/68211.